In the beginning, Facebook was a networking platform that was created for college students. Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook achieved amazing success with the college crowd and soon expanded to numerous colleges across the country. Soon, it was made available online to anyone with an email address. Most of the early users were young people. The older generation was very reluctant to use the social media platform. However, a recent study showed that Facebook is losing touch with the younger generation. In fact Facebook lost millions of users that were under 25.
Facebook Is For Older People
Recent studies performed by an organization outside of Facebook showed that the social platform was losing out on several youth groups. Those youth groups were the under 25 crowd that generally are the heaviest users of the social media platforms. Of course, the younger generation loved Facebook in the beginning. Facebook was probably very happy with that demographic because they attract more advertisers. More advertisers means more profits for Facebook. Taking a look at the numbers, its easy to note that under 25 years old users declines dramatically. In fact, this is a steady decline that seems to be continuing.
What Led To The Decline
There are a number of factors that led to the decline of the under 25 Facebook users. Early on, Facebook was the place to share all your information and to keep up with friends, schoolmates, and other associates. Parents simply did not get Facebook. Therefore, this fact improved the cool factor of using the social media site. However, Facebook has gone old school. Now, Facebook is the social media of choice for your parents and grandparents. The younger crowd prefer other social media sites to share quick bits of information. The under 25 crowd are not that interested in sharing their time line with followers. Today, Snapchat and Instagram are the place to go for the under 25 crowd.
Marketers online, predict that Facebook will lose even more of their under 25 users in the future. However, the same group predicts that more and more older users will continue to use Facebook well into the future. Certainly, a bit of good news for Facebook and advertisers.
As most already know, the FCC voted successfully to repeal net neutrality, but what exactly does this mean?
We need only to look at countries that already lack net neutrality laws to see what America’s internet may look like in the very near future. Allow me to be the first to tell you, it looks grim.
Let’s take a look at Portugal. Meo is a national wireless provider that sells data to the country’s smartphone users. Meo charges you a monthly plan for its service as expected for any product, and just like our service here in the United States, if you go over your limits you have to buy more data. The country differs in one major way. You have to pay extra to unlock certain apps and social media services.
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, Tumblr and Pinterest is the social media package. If you pay 4.99 extra per month you are free to use those websites as much as you want. If you prefer to call over a voice chat instead of typical social media texting then you will need to pay another 4.99 to unlock Skype, Google Hangouts, and Facetime. Want to have unlimited access to your email? That will be another 4.99. If you have a subscription to netflix, you will need to pay an additional 4.99 or else be hit with overage charges when you inevitably cross over your data limits. Portugal calls this “Zero-Rating.”
Now that you understand exactly what America’s future internet may look like, allow me to give you some reassuring news. Mozilla, the company behind popular internet browser firefox, has reopened a lawsuit against the FCC. Mozilla claims that the FCCs vote is unconstitutional and have vowed to not stop fighting no matter how many times the FCC denies them.
Mozilla urges people who agree that the internet should be an open lane for all to travel where they please to do what they can to help as well. Mozilla has set up a page with all the information needed to contact your representatives and tell them how you feel about the FCC’s vote.
In recent years, people have made social media a very large part of their lives. They do not go a single day without posting, chatting, tweeting, or messaging. This new technology phase in the nation has become a normal routine for millions of people. Even children as young as two and three have the capability of getting of using tablets, and cell phones to get to a site that they enjoy. Technology, and all of the many devices are baby sitting most of the children in the nation. They can sit quietly for hours, and manipulate technological devices.
Pre teens and teenagers are so engrossed in their devices that it is difficult for them to concentrate on anything else. It seems that their entire life is devoted to social media, which can become addictive to it’s users. Teens are so engaged in this phenomenon, that they break the rules of their schools, and classrooms. Most schools have policies in place against the use of cell phones and other devices in the classrooms. Many students have been found secretly using their devices in class, thus losing focus of classroom content. They use social media to keep in touch with what’s going on outside the school.
This has become a problem worth needing intervention. The social media industry has a variety of contact program options from which individuals can use. One of the options, facebook, has noted a decline in the number of users between the ages of twelve and seventeen.
Your text to link…
This information was the result of a measurement made by an eMarketer firm. That particular age group has discontinued their facebook interactions and shifted to another of the social media sites. The reason for the disinterest is really not known, but teenagers do change their minds quickly, and opt for what ever is trending most often. Keeping a teen on a facebook page, or any other, for a long period of time is virtually impossible due to their desire to constantly try new things. what ever the buzz is about, that is what they will be drawn to. They want to keep their territory just for themselves, and the want it to have the capability to cater to people in their demographics.
An executive order recently garnered President Donald Trump’s signature, which is not anything new if you have been watching the news, but this one is something most people will be pleased with. In an effort that President Trump touts will help to build rural America, his executive order will help bring high speed internet into rural parts of the country.
It has long been believed that faster internet speeds in more rural locations could help shrink the economic divide that exists between urban and rural America. The idea has always been something intriguing, but the cost has kept it from becoming a reality. It is believed, per a 2016 report from the Federal Communications Commission, that about 39% of Americans located in rural areas do not have access to high speed internet service. An official notice from the White House stated that it is time for rural America to get connected. It is necessary for tractors, for schools, and for home-based business. It is an important step needed to help spur more private development in these areas. In the mean time, the rest of the administration will be hard at work looking for funding for this project. As with any project of this size and stature, funding is key, and it isn’t always so easy to come by. President Trump has spoken on building up infrastructure in the United States many times, this seems to be one of his plans to get that spurred.
While this is certainly not moving mountains, it is a start to a problem that should be resolved. America is a developed nation and its people should all be awarded the same or similar opportunities for growth, education, work, and financially. The addition of high speed internet in these types of locations can begin the growth that can eventually develop better and more financially stable cities across the nation. If you are looking for more information and a video of President Trump announcing his executive order, head to Huffington Post.
The Internet as we know it did not end with FCC chairman Ajit Pai’s decision to repeal Obama’s net neutrality measure, but activists were crestfallen anyway. The debate online reached heated levels, complete with dramatic threats and suicide pacts on the part of the activists. Now, the US Senate has amassed enough sponsors to block the FCC’s decision. If this goes through, the matter of whether to make the FCC be the steward of net neutrality might be taken out of Ajit Pai’s hands.
Ajit Pai isn’t necessarily taking a stance that the Internet shouldn’t be free and accessible to everyone, but merely that the FCC isn’t the organization to oversee it, and that this political battle is being stated on false fronts in the first place. Activists have framed it as “big corporations vs. the people,” but it’s actually “access providers vs. content providers.” Social media websites have taken up arms in activist support of net neutrality, while telecom companies have protested it. For Ajit Pai’s part, he tried to lighten the mood with a humorous video just before Christmas where he tried to communicate his aims via popular Internet memes such as Star Wars references and the Harlem Shake dance, but his pleas fell on deaf ears.
The actual policy that was set up for repeal is also widely misunderstood. Even reporters at Washington Post report the 2015 measure as having the effect of preventing Internet service providers from showing favorable traffic preferences based on websites or content. Surely, that was the eventual intent, but all that then-president Obama actually passed in 2015 was a reclassification of the Internet to fall under Title II of the Communications Act of 1934. This act was initially designed to moderate communication “by wire and radio.” At this point, the political system is beginning to show its strain in trying to keep up with the rate of technology progress.
Nevertheless, this ad-hoc solution is widely seen as a step better than no steps at all, so pro-net-neutrality activists are vowing to make support of Title II Internet moderation a campaign issue.
The Internet is a vast network that covers the whole universe by connecting not only all computers but also other computerized across the entire world. The internet contains strong data lines which strongly distribute network to the whole of locations in the world. Technology is a collection of techniques incorporated into production of goods and services scientifically. Tech can either be in form of knowledge or machines which at the end leads to production of tangible or intangible advancements that aids in diverse working.
Technology has been evolving since the old age periods till today. Same to the internet where innovations are daily carried out to ensure that it is in the best shape it deserves to be. Improvement in the status has enhanced much positive improvement to the economy. Believe it or not, technology has been upgrading to a point of no problem currently lacks a solution. The rate of productivity has been increasing in a blink of an eye due to the high rate of technology improvement. Technology has been so paramount as much as all fields of operation are concerned.
Initially, when internet was being invented, it was only in wired form and was not so much impactful. In today’s world, the internet has not been left behind as far as upgrading is concerned. The Internet has spread its roots to all worlds’ operation. Be it in education, medical field, and business realm and so much more, the internet has been of great significance in all that. Today, wireless internet services is not a miracle to leave people gazing since it has existed for some years now. Speed is not an issue to be discussing on the internet. Unlike before, internet speed has been improving day in day out.
Both internet and technology share similarities though they are two different fields. You find that technological devices in one way or the other rely on the internet services. A good example is with phones and computers. These two are common on the technology platform, and as it is well known, they require the internet to function at some point. Coming to the internet is that network and connections are intangible, they are upgraded and put in the best shape possible by technological devices.
The net neutrality concept says that internet providers should treat all data on the internet the same and not limit or block certain content or sites. Major companies have been fined for blocking or slowing content from certain sites. This could all change very soon.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is making a controversial decision to end net neutrality protections with a planned vote on December 14. The vote is expected to pass, but the measure could be halted in court because it lacks evidence for such a drastic change in policy. The Supreme Court states that all federal agencies must make a good case for any such extreme actions. The rules were put into place in 2015 under the previous administration and the FCC says that these rules have decreased investment in the internet. This statement appears to be inaccurate because data shows that investment in the internet has increased in recent years.
The vast majority of Americans seem to support net neutrality and are against the changes by the FCC. The FCC also plans on preventing governments from regulating broadband service. Many experts feel these changes will create legal challenges. It is unclear exactly why the FCC is taking these controversial actions since they don’t have data or public support on their side. On the surface, this appears to be continued movement of rollbacks of the previous administrations policies. The original net neutrality policy dates back to 2005 and existed under former presidents Bush and Obama. Once the proposed changes go into effect, it could take a very long time to come to a resolution as it goes through the court system and could eventually end up in the United States Supreme Court. Unfortunately, once the FCC vote passes on December 14, the public may soon start feeling the effects of the changes.
Recently, the FCC has given notice that it will do away with Net Neutrality in an upcoming vote. Most people in the country are not very tech literate, so the fact of this vote is floating under the radar. Those people who are knowledgeable about such things see this as an alarming occurrence.
FCC Chairman Ajit Pai has stated that he plans to get rid of the protections that net neutrality provide. He has intimated that doing so would allow the free market to govern the growth and prosperity of the internet and that this move by the FCC is a good thing. In actuality, this move could prove to be disastrous to general public.
Net Neutrality affords the general public a number of protections. The basic tenet of net neutrality is that ISP’s should treat all internet traffic equally. This means that they should not throttle or block specific on purpose or allow companies to pay for special treatment and faster speeds.
This could be very detrimental to consumers companies transfer their increased cost to use the internet to their customers. Services such as Spotify, Netflix, Pandora, and others could see a sharp increase in price for end users without the protections that net neutrality provide.
As of now, the votes are there to end net neutrality. The measure would pass 3-2. The is hope, however, to block this potential calamity. The court has stated in matters, such as these, that agencies must provide satisfactory reasoning behind the decisions that they make. In the case of net neutrality, Pai’s reasoning is far from satisfactory. That fact, coupled with the public’s overwhelming support of net neutrality, will more than likely find that the Court would oppose the elimination of net neutrality on legal grounds. The possibility of losing net neutrality may be disturbing, but it is far from a certainty.
The medical fraternity is spending a lot of resources and time in looking for the cure of age-related diseases rather than on the prevention mechanisms. There is very minimal research being conducted in the medical field on the prevention of aging diseases such as Alzheimer, Dementia or Diabetes among others. Jason Hope, an innovative and technology-oriented entrepreneur, is one man who is in the forefront championing for more research, time and resources in the prevention of age-related diseases.
Jason Hope has gone an extra mile to initiate initiatives that promote further research on anti-aging. Besides Hope has donated millions of dollars to the SENS foundation to help in the study of aging and aging diseases which have been ignored for quite a long time by the medical community. The SENS Foundation is a non- profit organization which was founded in the year 2009 with the aim of tackling age-related diseases head-on. Since its formation, the SENS Foundation has focused all its energy and resources on what is referred to as Rejuvenation Biotechnology.
Hope philanthropy activities have revolved around the SENS Foundation. In the year 2010 Hope donated 500,000 dollars to the foundation. The funds were used to help in the construction of the Cambridge SENS laboratory and initiate other research initiatives. Hope did not stop there, and from time to time he sends his donations amounting to millions of dollars to help further the cause he believes in, and learn more about Jason Hope.
Hope in a statement said that he was very honored to be part of the SENS Foundation and that the reason behind his involvement with the organization is that he believes in their cause of advancing human medicine which when successful will revolutionize the healthcare, pharmaceuticals and biotech industries. Besides donating funds Hope is actively involved in the organization’s outreach programs, and resume him.
About Jason Hope
Jason Hope is an entrepreneur and a philanthropist who is very passionate about the internet of things. Hope is popularly known by many as a futurist who has an in-depth knowledge of technological innovations and makes predictions on the future of technology. Hope hails from the state of Arizona, and http://inspirery.com/jason-hope/.
Hope in pursuit of education attended Arizona State University where he graduated with a Bachelor of Finance Degree. Hope is also, holds an MBA holder from W.P Carey School of Business.
Jason Hope is a strong believer on the Internet of things and predicts that it is the next big thing in the technology industry. The internet of things will lead to the interconnectivity of devices which will go a long way in making life better.
Thanks to modern day technology, it’s never been easier to watch television and movies from just about any handheld device, computer, or television. When people have a show to watch, they easily bring up almost any episode thanks to Netflix, Amazon, and Hulu. There are many video-streaming services available but people tend to stick to those three because they are the biggest and most well-known. Well, it seems that soon a newcomer will make its way to the market and it’s hard to tell how well they will do.
Apple will soon be entering the streaming video business which is already a very competitive field. According to Forbes, there will be an influx of streaming services. This is due to the fact that studios such as Disney, HBO, and Warner Brothers will be launching their own services instead of going through one of the others that are already available. Does this mean that some will sink and some will swim? Only time will tell.
Apple seems to have the biggest advantage though when it comes to the streaming game. Apple already has Apple Music and a hefty number of followers. If they unveil the video streaming free of charge to Apple music subscribers, they will already have instant followers. They could go a number of ways with this. They could rely on word of mouth to spread the word. They could offer membership at a reduced fee to get both. Apple is already doing quite well so even if they lose out on a little bit of money, in the beginning, it will be worth it.
Apple is a big name with instant recognition. They already have people who know, trust and love their products. That’s why it’s actually quite smart of them to make their way to the video-streaming market. They should be able to bring fans over and even make them convert from one of the other streaming services. Apple has had success with previous business adventures and they should see the same success with this one. Apple also has Disney on their side. Together they have a good partnership and this could bode well for streaming. Apple will have plenty of choices when it comes to where they choose to pull content from.